When fans search for 49ers vs Tampa Bay Buccaneers match player stats, they’re usually looking for more than just a box score. They want context. They want to know who dominated, who struggled, and how individual performances shaped the outcome. This matchup has become one of the more intriguing inter-conference clashes in recent NFL seasons, blending San Francisco’s physical, disciplined style with Tampa Bay’s aggressive and adaptable approach.
In this article, we’ll break down the 49ers vs Tampa Bay Buccaneers match player stats in a way that feels both casual and expert-driven. Instead of throwing raw numbers at you, we’ll explain what those stats actually mean on the field, how key players influenced the game, and why certain performances mattered more than others. Let’s dive in.
Quarterback Matchup: How the Game Was Controlled
The quarterback battle is always the headline when analyzing 49ers vs Tampa Bay Buccaneers match player stats, and this matchup did not disappoint. San Francisco’s quarterback focused heavily on efficiency, ball control, and quick reads. Rather than forcing risky throws, the 49ers leaned on timing routes and yards after catch, which kept the offense moving and the defense honest.
On the other side, Tampa Bay’s quarterback took a more aggressive approach. The Buccaneers looked to stretch the field vertically, testing the 49ers’ secondary with deep shots and sideline throws. While this approach led to some explosive gains, it also came with pressure-related challenges as San Francisco’s defensive front closed in consistently.
From a statistical standpoint, the contrast was clear. The 49ers quarterback posted strong completion efficiency and fewer negative plays, while Tampa Bay’s signal-caller accumulated more total passing yards but faced higher pressure rates. These differences in quarterback stats highlight the philosophical gap between the two offenses and explain how momentum shifted throughout the game.
Running Back Performances: Ground Game Impact
Any serious breakdown of 49ers vs Tampa Bay Buccaneers match player stats must include the running backs, especially given San Francisco’s long-standing reputation for elite rushing schemes. The 49ers running backs showcased patience, vision, and physicality, consistently turning modest blocking into solid gains.
San Francisco’s ground attack wasn’t about one breakout run; it was about consistency. The running backs wore down Tampa Bay’s defensive front by attacking the edges, exploiting cutback lanes, and maintaining balance between inside and outside runs. Stat sheets reflected steady yards per carry and a high number of positive runs, which kept the offense on schedule.
Tampa Bay’s rushing attack faced a tougher challenge. While the Buccaneers backs showed flashes of explosiveness, the 49ers’ disciplined run defense limited sustained success. The Buccaneers’ rushing stats reveal fewer attempts and more reliance on short-yardage situations, reinforcing how game flow pushed Tampa Bay toward a pass-heavy approach.
Wide Receivers and Tight Ends: Who Won the Air Battle
When analyzing 49ers vs Tampa Bay Buccaneers match player stats, the receiving units tell a fascinating story. San Francisco’s receivers excelled in creating separation after the catch. Short and intermediate routes turned into meaningful gains thanks to crisp route running and physical play.
The 49ers’ tight end usage also stood out statistically. Targeted frequently in key situations, tight ends served as safety valves and red-zone weapons. Their reception totals may not always dominate headlines, but their third-down efficiency significantly impacted time of possession.
Tampa Bay’s receivers brought a different energy. Their stats reflect deeper average target distances and more contested catches. Buccaneers receivers often faced tight coverage, yet still managed to produce chunk plays. While this approach increased total receiving yards, it also resulted in a lower catch rate, which ultimately influenced drive sustainability.
Defensive Standouts: Tackles, Sacks, and Disruption

Defense plays a massive role in shaping 49ers vs Tampa Bay Buccaneers match player stats, and this game was no exception. San Francisco’s defensive front consistently disrupted the Buccaneers’ rhythm. Defensive linemen posted strong pressure numbers, forcing hurried throws and limiting Tampa Bay’s ability to develop deep routes.
Linebackers for the 49ers filled gaps quickly and recorded high tackle counts. Their stats reflect not just quantity, but quality, with many tackles coming near the line of scrimmage. This prevented short gains from turning into explosive plays.
Tampa Bay’s defense responded with aggression of its own. Buccaneers defenders recorded solid tackle totals and showed discipline in coverage, especially in the red zone. While sack numbers may not fully tell the story, quarterback hits and pass breakups highlight how Tampa Bay kept the game competitive through defensive effort.
Offensive Line Stats: The Hidden Battle
One of the most overlooked aspects of 49ers vs Tampa Bay Buccaneers match player stats is offensive line performance. For the 49ers, strong pass protection numbers and effective run blocking allowed skill players to shine. Fewer pressures allowed the quarterback to operate comfortably and execute the game plan efficiently.
Run-blocking stats also favored San Francisco. Linemen consistently reached the second level, enabling running backs to gain extra yards. These contributions don’t always appear prominently on stat sheets, but they directly influence offensive success.
Tampa Bay’s offensive line faced a tougher challenge. Pressure rates against their quarterback were noticeably higher, which affected passing efficiency. However, the line showed resilience in short-yardage and goal-line situations, proving their value beyond basic statistics.
Turnovers and Penalties: Momentum-Changing Stats
Turnovers and penalties are critical when breaking down 49ers vs Tampa Bay Buccaneers match player stats, because they often decide close games. San Francisco’s ability to protect the football played a major role in maintaining momentum. Low turnover numbers kept their defense fresh and limited Tampa Bay’s scoring opportunities.
Tampa Bay, on the other hand, had moments where turnovers or near-turnovers shifted momentum. Interceptions, forced fumbles, or even dropped picks can swing emotional and statistical momentum in a game, and those moments were reflected in field position stats.
Penalty stats also mattered. The 49ers displayed discipline, limiting drive-killing infractions. Tampa Bay’s penalty numbers were slightly higher, and while not overwhelming, they extended drives and altered field position just enough to influence the final outcome.
Special Teams Contributions: Field Position Matters
Special teams often get overlooked, but they are essential when evaluating 49ers vs Tampa Bay Buccaneers match player stats. San Francisco’s special teams unit delivered consistent kickoff coverage and reliable field goal execution. These steady contributions ensured no hidden yardage was lost.
Punt returns and coverage units also played a role. The 49ers maintained favorable average starting field position, giving their offense a subtle but important advantage. These stats don’t dominate headlines, but they show up clearly when analyzing drive efficiency.
Tampa Bay’s special teams had mixed results. While kicking accuracy remained solid, return stats showed limited explosiveness. That lack of big special-teams plays meant Tampa Bay had to work harder offensively to score.
Final Thoughts: What the Player Stats Really Tell Us
Looking at 49ers vs Tampa Bay Buccaneers match player stats as a whole, one theme stands out: balance versus explosiveness. San Francisco’s stats reflect efficiency, discipline, and consistency across all units. Tampa Bay’s numbers highlight aggression, vertical playmaking, and resilience under pressure.
This matchup wasn’t decided by one superstar performance alone. Instead, it was shaped by collective execution, situational football, and subtle statistical advantages. From quarterback efficiency to defensive pressure rates, every category contributed to the final narrative.

